Can the Navy Beat Its Greatest Foe? And No, Not Russia, China or North Korea.

    Dave Majumdar


    One word: exhaustion.

    It is simply not sustainable to have a 275-ship Navy that has 100 ships underway at any given time. The Navy needs to expand its numbers with smaller, cheaper surface combatants such a new multi-mission frigate that the can relieve high-end warships such as DDGs from mundane missions such as forward presence. With frigates relieving the DDGs from those roles, cruisers and destroyers can focus on high-end missions such as missile defense.

    With the USS John S. McCain (DDG-56) knocked out of commission after a collision on Aug. 21 in the Straits of Malacca, the United States Navy is down two ballistic missile defense-capable Aegis destroyers in the Pacific.

    With USS Fitzgerald (DDG-62) being also being knocked out of action after a June 17 collision off the Japanese coast, the loss of the two vessels from operational service could not come at a worse time for the Navy, which needs of all the ballistic missile defense assets it can get to deal with the North Korean threat. Nor does the Navy have a good way to mitigate for the loss of those vessels—the 275-ship fleet is already stretched thin.

    Recommended: How an ‘Old’ F-15 Might Kill Russia’s New Stealth Fighter

    Recommended: How China Plans to Win a War Against the U.S. Navy

    Recommended: How the Air Force Would Destroy North Korea

    “The U.S. combat fleet is already over-stretched,” Seth Cropsey, director of the Center for American Seapower at the Hudson Institute told The National Interest.

    (This first appered in August.)

    Read full article



    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here